+
☰
sports spectrum
✕
Cricket IPL Cricket ICC Football Kabaddi Olympics Athletics Sports History
AboutContactPrivacy Policy
✕

Academies stopped producing fullbacks who can defend

A decade of building ball-playing wide defenders has left senior sides short of anyone who can win a one on one.

Academies stopped producing fullbacks who can defend

Watch a youth match and the fullbacks look like midfielders. They are comfortable receiving under pressure, they take the ball on the half turn, they play forward. All of that is good coaching and all of it is what senior football now asks of them. What almost none of them can do is defend a winger who is isolated against them with twenty metres of grass and no cover.

That skill was never popular to teach because it is unglamorous and because it fails often. Defending a one on one is about approach speed, body angle, patience and the willingness to be beaten occasionally without panicking. It cannot be drilled in a possession rondo. It needs repetition in a scenario that most academy sessions have quietly stopped running, because the sessions are built around the ball and this is a situation where the point is to not commit.

The consequence shows up at first-team level in a specific way. A side plays out from the back, gets pressed, loses it, and now there is one defender against one attacker on the touchline. Twenty years ago that was routine and the fullback dealt with it. Now the fullback either dives in, because he has been taught to be aggressive in possession and translates that instinct badly, or he backs off all the way to the byline and concedes a cross that he was in a position to prevent.

I do not think this is nostalgia. It is a straightforward consequence of what gets selected for at fourteen, which is comfort on the ball, and what does not get selected for, which is the temperament to defend in isolation and lose sometimes. Those two profiles are not opposed in principle. They are just rarely found together, and when a scout has to choose, the passing is visible on a highlight reel and the defending is not.

The clubs that noticed have started buying rather than producing. That works, and it is expensive, and it means the academy is producing players who will spend their careers at a level where the winger is slower.

Teach the boring thing. Somebody still has to stop the cross.

How did you feel about this article?