+
☰
sports spectrum
✕
Cricket IPL Cricket ICC Football Kabaddi Olympics Athletics Sports History
AboutContactPrivacy Policy
✕

Reverse swing needs a dry ground more than it needs rough leather

Scuffing gets all the attention and the suspicion, when the abrasive outfield and the absence of moisture do most of the work.

Reverse swing needs a dry ground more than it needs rough leather

The conversation about reverse swing always slides towards what somebody did to the ball with his fingernails, and it is the least interesting part. The physics needs a heavy, rough side and a smooth, lighter side, and the way that difference gets created is mostly environmental. Ask what surface the ball has been bouncing on for forty overs.

A hard, dry, abrasive square with sparse grass wears one side of a ball quickly. A lush green outfield with heavy evening moisture does the opposite, keeps both sides damp and soft, and no amount of polishing on a trouser leg will produce the asymmetry required. This is why reverse arrives routinely in some countries by the thirtieth over and is practically unknown in others, and why the same touring bowlers who look like magicians in one place look ordinary in another with identical technique.

Dryness matters twice over. The shine side has to stay genuinely shiny, and shine is applied with sweat and saliva, which behave completely differently in dry heat than in humidity. In dry conditions the moisture evaporates and leaves the polish. In humid air it sits there and the ball simply gets damp and heavy on both sides, which is the opposite of what you want.

Then the technique. The seam is angled towards the slips and the shiny side is held on the leg side, the reverse of orthodox swing, and the ball moves late because at those speeds the airflow on the rough side turns turbulent and clings longer. Late is the whole point. The batter's decision has already been made.

This also explains the fielding side's obsession with who is allowed to touch the ball. One player keeps the shine, everyone else throws it in on the bounce to rough the other side further, and the whole exercise is an attempt to make the outfield do faster what it was doing anyway.

The suspicion that follows the skill around has always struck me as geographically selective. Bowlers who found reverse in one part of the world were investigated. Bowlers who found lateral movement in humid conditions with a new ball were praised for their wrist.

Both are conditions plus craft. Only one of them ever needed a lawyer.

How did you feel about this article?